p-ISSN 2146-796X
e-ISSN 2146-7978
Yunus Söylet,
Recep Öztürk,
Salih Murat Akkın,
Süphan Nasır
2018 Volume 8
Deomed Publishing
Çevrimiçi Erken Baskı / Online Preprint Issue
Original Empirical Research
Received: March 7, 2017; Accepted: January 9, 2018; Published online: April 30, 2018
doi:10.2399/yod.18.007; Copyright © 2018, Deomed
Analysis of academicians' views about academic incentive system - A performance-based allowance practice
Gürol Yokuş1 (E-mail), Burak Ayçiçek2, Sedat Kanadlı1
1Department of Education Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey; 2Ministry of Education, Süleyman Şah Multi-program Anatolian High School, Hatay, Turkey
Performance, motivation and incentive concepts are considered significant for higher education institutions. This study aims to identify academicians' views related to academic incentive system which started in 2015. The study is a qualitative research in descriptive model. The study group consists of 27 academicians working at different universities. For data collection, "Open-ended Questionnaire Form for Academic Incentive System" was developed by the researcher. According to the repetition frequency of academicians' views on the incentive system, the categories appeared as follows: "Negative Outcomes Related to Scientific Ethics", "Deviation from Dominance of Quantity and Academic Purpose", "Fresh Blood to the Tired Turkish Scientific Society", "Affective Dimension Related to the Academic Incentive", "Discomfort in Academic Community about Scoring Criteria", and "Demotivation in Academic Community". The codes appeared according to the order of importance and repetition frequency are: "dissemination of unethical behaviors" (f=18), "suggestions and expectations from academicians for improvement" (f=15), "response to specific items of scoring" (f=14), "quantitative increase / qualitative decrease" (f=13), "academic incentive as a performance enhancing figure" (f=13), "positive affective attitude" (f=13), "academic incentive as a motivational figure" (f=11); "response to the 30 point criterion for incentive" (f=7), "relating academic effort to money" (f=7), "negative affective attitude" (f=6); "risk of creating a commercial market" (f=6); "institutional competitiveness" (f=5); "academic incentive as a mobbing tool" (f=5); "problem of determining the reputation of academicians according to the incentive system" (f=4). Consequently, academicians state that the academic community did not work well, therefore government's incentive system aims to increase academic productivity; but it leads to unethical issues and demotivation.
Keywords: Academic incentive, academic performance, performance-based evaluation
Recommend on Facebook...
Share on Twitter...
ASOS Index
Open Access
Our journal promotes the development of global open access to scientific information and research...

E-Mail Alert!
Would you like to receive an e-mail alert whenever a new article is published in the journal?

Your Opinions are Important to Us!
We are waiting for your valuable opinions and contributions...

Yükseköğretim Dergisi / Journal of Higher Education

Yükseköğretim Strateji ve Araştırma Derneği (YÖSAD) yayın organıdır. Deomed Yayıncılık tarafından yayımlanmaktadır. / Official Publication of the Higher Education Strategy and Research Association (YÖSAD). Published by Deomed Publishing. Copyright © 2018, Deomed.
Creative Commons License
Yükseköğretim Dergisi çevrimiçi (online) sürümünde yayımlanan akademik içeriğin kullanım hakları, ilgili içerikte tersi belirtilmediği sürece Deomed Yayıncılık tarafından Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND3.0) lisansı aracılığıyla bedelsiz sunulmaktadır. / Except where otherwise noted, academic content of this online version of the journal by Deomed Publishing is licensed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution-NoCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND3.0) License.